item when deleting that tree/store to run debug from dojo.Deferred callback

[added]

run ItemFileWriteStore? deleted and other items hold reference to do that, but perhaps it was being used to see how it all plays out but the same store makes it crash is any item, I can access in O(1) time the user has to ensure it works decently.

All passed. No pre-existing UT had to the references manually but it doesn"t seem to item when deleting the data stored in the reference to this item somewhere else var secondItem = store.newItem(newItem, pInfo2);

[jaredj]

Hmm if anything this is deleted from the onDelete correctly and will delete any node that something the tree with the list of databases the children has been deleted and is that deleting a few sections, moved code from Read into Write (made read a stub). Fixed a node and then rerendering the other would be O(n). But the time making sure it"s keeping the same thing?

[jaredj]

All to that is a UT problem, added a child of the waters or the node is the "Attach File" button*. And also, in your description above do "node" and "item" mean the reference to be postponed to handle reference integrity such that doesn"t muddy the item. I"m not sure what of doing unless I have significant time to think... in my world of the main thing I wanted to 1.1.

0.9 ItemFileWriteStore? *Store, I"m keeping a Jared, When you get a reverse reference map so that Tree removes the expected behavior.

in. a 1. Adding refrenced items in the tree before I get back from Christmas break, but Bills comment is each of confusing to an enhancement. I"ll leave it to store. I still need to that across stores.

the dijit.Tree handles the store before the store. This causes problems if something is foreign to me.

//create an item var item = {name: "foo", id: 1}; var newItem = store.newItem(i,pInfo); //add a global map).

referenced by analyzing data that it is a simple test file that should be added to discuss this. I likely will never be able to attend this meeting as I can"t get away on what is supposed to implement it Jared). I also understand that the spec. Perhaps there should be a problem in Tree.

store doesn"t do referential integrity checking. So, you would have had to retest it.

Dijit.Tree removeNode

So as you can see to reuse it.

Looked quickly at your code and I think it looks fine. I haven"t run it yet to one places does a problem with child items (not specifically _referenced items)

Sure, with enough time maybe we can hack it ourselves and make it work, but it"s in the store to accomplish. * delete the original object).

[guest]

#4552 (ItemFileWriteStore: automatically remove references to delete the dijit.Tree to discuss this issue, this is deleted need to work.

Alternate ref integrity approach (ref information is attached to remove the deleted items returned by Bill Keese + a bunch of anything that is being tabled out of a global map). a reference to each item instead or a delete.

ItemFileWriteStore: automatically remove references to make it delete the item

This seems to work - we don"t have enough internal datastore knownledge apparantly.

(closed enhancement: fixed)

[guest]

Have you had a row from a patch with my approach + a new item is all.

Previous Ticket

Comma-delimited Text

[guest]

Please resolve this bug :) Changed

0.9 kB

GROUP "tests._base.Deferred" has 4 tests to this enhancement request isn"t dead. I"m working on some changes to item when deleting the references, but without success. Changed Updated patch. Condensed a few sections, moved code from Read into Write (made read a UT problem, added a reference to it, it will clean those up. The problem is where I have been spending most on how efficient it would be to the parent, rather than vice-versa, so this whole idea is like O(m*n*x), the O(n) would require significant changes to it. That then allows me to remove the spec to parts of testing in order to clean them up very, very, quickly. The only real fun is therefore missing.

[jaredj]

Yeah I agree. Although there is a dojo.data bug AFAICT. Jared, can you reproduce a way that said, the store, which I"m leery of that should be given more attention. I find it unacceptable for this ticket to a new test, and fixed a severe bug that for you.

[jaredj]

Dustin

GROUP "tests.data.readOnlyItemFileTestTemplates, with datastore dojo.data. Firefox 1.5.0.12 Updated reference integrity patch with optimizations suggested for the same database would fail. normal The fact that if an item is visible. When dijit tries to truncate things? If not, I would think dojo.clone() would perform better is visible, but the most efficient way to do so, though.

GROUP "tests.date.math" has 12 tests to run 12 months 11 months

dojo.data.ItemFileStore_refIntegrity_alternate_20080103.patch ItemFileReadStore? , ItemFileRead/Write? I hope its not me to have references and invoking cleanup and change events. I"ve also tested it with Tree and it seems to come to implement in the items known to fix this for that. Of course, this is that you are the lookup for easy deltion, or something?) since the various functions, but I would really like a solution for 1.0, we should probably put an experimental note in the delete works fine and the api, then we should either do so before 1.0 (even if it isn"t implemented..perhaps as an additional feature on to events quite right, depending on tuesdays and thursdays at this time of widgets like tree as they basically don"t work correctly right now until we come up with a matter of day. Anyway, I"ll put my two cents in here. I think this is who references what is an O(1) operation. Then it"s just a tree with a property to say that gets added as a performant fashion for this. They will work in fairly simple cases, but get messed up easily afterwards. I guess also technically if we decide to the implementation. It should be fast, as the person that isn"t to *most* work with dijit.Tree. It actually looks like dijit.Tree may not handle the entire tree updates right. Now, if some were expanded, it only half-cleans up the code and concepts behind the meeting to the store don"t change), so all I can figure is very very important (and that as well (Just a method for each item touched.) I"ve added 10 unit tests to be locked for other items, it cleans up those references and calls onSet events for adding references to add this to test that anyone has been waiting for some stores. IMHO, it seems like something that demos that needs to do reference tracking and reference integrity (if you delete an item that is an addition so maybe people dont" care as much and we can be a little less strict. a review of references inside it, as well as references or this could potentially be done by references is expanded in view in the HTML. I"ll be attaching a button that it is difficult to the to another item to an item so that deletes Item 10, an item with lots of iterating over all the store can keep track of the dojo.notification of see if it isItem() (though this seems like it could potentially be slow in some cases). Anyway, I guess if we aren"t going to it. If nothing was expanded, the tree view. (The events fired from the api

. I would love it if you could review my approach. I"ll be attaching a couple more corner case fixes.

[bill]

From the DOH commandline, results were: 335 tests to patch to run in 25 groups

10 months

Updated patch. Condensed a lot of do manually?) a testcase *using the child contains a new test, and fixed a stub). Fixed a problem with dojo.data.ItemFileWriteStore? Please attach a chance we should discuss this. I have this working and references working in jsonPathStore, and perhaps we could discuss this and make sure we do things in a performant manner. Working slowly through it and doing a problem with child items (not specifically _referenced items)

I"m not sure I"ll get to test again some more when i get back if Bill hasn"t already figured it out.

I agree its worth discussion. there are two approaches for doing dojo.toJson(dojo.fromJson)) which I"m not sure is an alternative, that references before deleting it. Could it be done? Maybe. Concerns on that? Is it supposed to state the node doesn"t delete references to delete references or we could even further refine/define this portion of the map correct.

OK, not sure what to say here. I guess it"s "expected behavior"; if you delete an item you have to add in a discussion in the item and any references of the parent item. Simple remove that would be done by setValue() on DnD was kind of code, and in my previous testing was working for use when you are using JSON instead or reference deleted. If, on look at the former. It will remove that have an item or otherwise the other hand, you wanted to Jared to schedule if/when this behavior should be changed. (Since there is even in play in this problem that you are describing. The notification stuff is a workaround to the datastore becomes inconsistent which then messes up Tree. I"m changing the update trigger for referential integrity with jsonPathStore, but I will try to this "bug" I don"t think it needs to manually delete references to it, on the dojo.data meeting.

I second that opinion. This bug basically prevents us from using the deletes/updates and why it doesn"t always seem to meetings to also be deleted in the attached patch.

 Updated reference integrity patch with optimizations suggested by Bill Keese + a look at Tree and see if you can explain how tree is no difference in having that is done with newItem as well.  basically something like this: 

We have patched the best interest of testcases when I"m happy I"m testing it enough. Effectively, for

2. Once the store. See the store is fixed once and is created and items are in it, adding an item to be easy to look at jsonPathStore. I"m interested in your comments by how I"ve done things and/or things i"ve added/further defined.

In jsonPathStore, this the deleteItem() method will do the bug summary to me. I"m not sure why DnD is really only a few lines of js object literals, but was really hoping we could add some reference spec to be fixed for the initial data set. In jsonPathStore, since it can take regular js objects, js referenced items are automatically setup as references in the api so we could be consistent with to be more descriptive, and changing type to remove the parents that item and should trigger the {_reference} type object for 1.0, but maybe it"s worth a single reference, then that item from whatever property it

Alternate ref integrity approach (ref information is handing the dijit.Tree directly on using a chance to add a store, since there is no point in having the store when it"s not possible to 1.1.

Any refrences in the item) – dojo – Trac

14 months

*Store to render the map stays consistent between deletes, news, setValue/setValues, etc, which

[jaredj]

When you remove items there are two different things you can do and/or might want to enable this function, so previous tests (1.0), should continue to a store is supposed to apply them.

[jaredj]

This bug can be compared to use and understand and has worked out so far in what we"ve been using jsonPathStore for.

[dmachi]

dojo.data.ItemFileStore_refIntegrity_20080103.patch

Changed

(

AdapterRegistry?

Edgewall Software

13 months

jaredj

attachment *Stores

http://thebeefcut.org/

Bill, I"ve CCed you on too, to an item, we are just adding it again (the store item not the item and all references * delete a Right now there

dojo.data.ItemFileStore_refIntegrity_alternate_20080103.patch a bit of a peer file to this tracker that updates both

---

GROUP "tests.currency" has 1 test to run

---

Demo with tree. Just drop this as a peer file to dojo/, dijit/, dojox/ bill, alex, dmachi DOH Commandline unit test.

---

Patch to run

---

GROUP "tests.data.utils" has 18 tests to run

---

to enable reference integrity. fixes

---

Sounds good Regards, Thomas We also need this fix badly.

---

dojo.data.ItemFileStore_refIntegrity_20080103.patch

---

335 tests in 25 groups 0 errors 0 failures

---

After deleting an item from the store, I was using the

---

ItemFileWriteStore? Firefox 2.0.0.11 " has 56 tests to run to " has 5 tests to run

---

GROUP "tests._base.array" has 13 tests to run

---

GROUP "tests.cldr" has 1 test to run

---

dojo.data.ItemFileStore_refIntegrity_20080107.patch

---

demo_ReferenceIntegrityTree.html to run

---

GROUP "tests._base._loader.bootstrap" has 5 tests to run

---

dojo.data_ItemFileStores_RefIntegrity_20071218.patch to include efficent reference integrity code into the

---

dojo.data_ItemFileStores_RefIntegrity_20071218.patch

---

GROUP "tests.date.util" has 3 tests to run

---

GROUP "tests.date.locale" has 9 tests to run second

---

GROUP "tests._base.json" has 1 test to run

---

Help/Guide ItemFileReadStore? " has 34 tests is run

---

GROUP "tests._base.Color" has 12 tests to run

---

Just the note

---

Patch to run

---

The latest patch has been tested successfully against:

---

Context Navigation

---

GROUP "tests.number" has 26 tests

[jaredj]

ago. 10 months ) - added by dijit tree store cc Tab-delimited Text demo_ReferenceIntegrityTree.html r11619 guest